Difference between revisions of "Acronym Guide - RTE Users"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
{|class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1" | {|class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1" | ||
Revision as of 06:22, 22 December 2009
| Participants* | Campaign | Version | Specific usage description | Evaluations / Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIU | RTE5 | Used in the search task, together with BADC, to create the new resource Abbr | No ablation test performed | |
| Siel_09 | RTE5 | The acronyms are expanded using the acronym database, so the acronyms are also matched with the expanded acronyms, and entailment is predicted accordingly. Ex: UK United Kingdom | Ablation test performed. Null impact of the resource both on two-way and on three-way task. | |
| UAIC | RTE5 | Acronym resolution. The resource has been expanded by a rule that consider for expressions like Xaaaa Ybbbb Zcccc the acronym XYZ, regardless of length of text with this form | Ablation test performed. Positive impact of the acronym module: +0.17% on two-way, +0.16% on three-way task. | |
| UAIC | RTE4 | Data taken from the RTE4 proceedings. Participants are recommended to add further information. | ||
| New user | Participants are encouraged to contribute. |
| Total: 4 |
|---|
[*] For further information about participants, click here: RTE Challenges - Data about participants
Return to RTE Knowledge Resources