Acronym Guide - RTE Users
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
When not otherwise specified, the data about version, usage and evaluation of the resource have been provided by participants themselves.
| Participants* | Campaign | Version | Specific usage description | Evaluations / Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siel_09 | RTE5 | The acronyms are expanded using the acronym database, so the acronyms are also matched with the expanded acronyms, and entailment is predicted accordingly. Ex: UK United Kingdom | Ablation test performed. Null impact of the resource both on two-way and on three-way task. | |
| UAIC | RTE5 | Acronym resolution. The resource has been expanded by a rule that consider for expressions like Xaaaa Ybbbb Zcccc the acronym XYZ, regardless of length of text with this form | Ablation test performed. Positive impact of the acronym module: +0.17% on two-way, +0.16% on three-way task. | |
| UAIC | RTE4 | Data taken from the RTE4 proceedings. Participants are recommended to add further information. | ||
| New user | Participants are encouraged to contribute. |
| Total: 1 |
|---|
[*] For further information about participants, click here: RTE Challenges - Data about participants
Return to RTE Knowledge Resources