Difference between revisions of "Graph Parsing (State of the Art)"

From ACL Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 23: Line 23:
 
graph bank statistics; and (d) a continuously evolving record of
 
graph bank statistics; and (d) a continuously evolving record of
 
state-of-the-art processing results.
 
state-of-the-art processing results.
 +
Of these, components (a) and (b) are provided by
 +
[http://www.mn.uio.no/ifi/english/people/aca/oe/cl.pdf Kuhlmann & Oepen (2016; in press)],
 +
while (c) and (d) are maintained below.
  
 
This page was initiated by
 
This page was initiated by

Revision as of 16:35, 23 May 2016

Background and Motivation

Graphs exceeding the formal complexity of rooted trees are of growing relevance to much NLP research. We interpret the term graph parsing broadly as mapping from surface strings to graph-structured target representations, which typically provide some level of syntactico-semantic analysis. Although formally well-understood in graph theory, there is substantial variation in the types of linguistic graphs, as well as in the interpretation of various structural properties. To provide a common terminology and transparent statistics across different collections of graphs in NLP, we propose to establish a ‘catalogue’ of graph banks and associated parsing results.

We anticipate a bit of a cottage industry in linguistic graph banks and graph processing tasks over the next few years, which may make it difficult to keep track of contentful similarities and differences across frameworks and approaches. This page is intended to stimulate community work towards an up-to-date resource combining the following components: (a) formal definitions of (relevant) structural graph properties; (b) in-depth descriptions of how these apply to different graph banks; (c) constantly growing surveys of graph bank statistics; and (d) a continuously evolving record of state-of-the-art processing results. Of these, components (a) and (b) are provided by Kuhlmann & Oepen (2016; in press), while (c) and (d) are maintained below.

This page was initiated by Marco Kuhlmann and Stephan Oepen, and for the time being (mid-May 2016) is very much a work in progress. We intend to have a first complete draft available for community review by early June 2016.

Software: Graph Analysis Toolkit

AMR: Abstract Meaning Representation

CCD: Combinatory Categorial Grammar Dependencies

EDS: Elementary Dependency Structures

SDP: Semantic Dependency Parsing