Difference between revisions of "POS Induction (State of the art)"

From ACL Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(clean refs)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
==Results==
 
==Results==
 
+
'''Listed in order of decreasing accuracy'''
* '''Listed in order of decreasing accuracy'''
+
  
  
Line 47: Line 46:
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 +
'''Listed alphabetically.'''
  
* '''Listed alphabetically.'''
+
* Berg-Kirkpatrick, Taylor, Alexandre Bouchard-Cote, John DeNero, and Dan Klein. 2010. [http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N/N10/N10-1083.pdf Painless Unsupervised Learning with Features]. NAACL 2010.
 
+
* Christodoulopoulos, Christos, Sharon Goldwater and Mark Steedman. 2010. [http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D/D10/D10-1056.pdf Two Decades of Unsupervised POS induction: How far have we come?] In Proceedings of EMNLP 2010.
 
+
* Clark, Alexander. 2003. [http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/E/E03/E03-1009.pdf Combining distributional and morphological information for part of speech induction]. In Proceedings of EACL 2003, pages 59–66, Morristown, NJ, USA.
[http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N/N10/N10-1083.pdf Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Alexandre Bouchard-Cote, John DeNero, and Dan Klein. 2010. Painless Unsupervised Learning with Features. NAACL 2010.]
+
* Yatbaz, Mehmet Ali, Enis Sert and Deniz Yuret. 2012. [http://aclweb.org/anthology//D/D12/D12-1086.pdf Learning Syntactic Categories Using Paradigmatic Representations of Word Context]. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2012, pages 940–951.
 
+
[http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D/D10/D10-1056.pdf Christos Christodoulopoulos, Sharon Goldwater and Mark Steedman. 2010. Two Decades of Unsupervised POS induction: How far have we come? In Proceedings of EMNLP 2010.]
+
 
+
[http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/E/E03/E03-1009.pdf Alexander Clark. 2003. Combining distributional and morphological information for part of speech induction. In Proceedings of EACL 2003, pages 59–66, Morristown, NJ, USA.]
+
 
+
[http://aclweb.org/anthology//D/D12/D12-1086.pdf Mehmet Ali Yatbaz, Enis Sert and Deniz Yuret. 2012. Learning Syntactic Categories Using Paradigmatic Representations of Word Context. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2012, pages 940-951.]
+
  
  

Revision as of 16:12, 7 March 2014

Evaluation

Many-to-1: Map every induced label to a gold standard tag greedily (45 labels to 45 tags of the Penn tag set). Use the mapping to compute tag accuracy on the Wall Street Journal portion of the Penn TreeBank.


Results

Listed in order of decreasing accuracy


System name Short description Main publications Software Many-to-1
UPOS Learning Syntactic Categories Using Paradigmatic Representations of Word Context Yatbaz et al. (2012) upos 80.2%
Brown+proto MRF initialized with Brown prototypes Christodoulopoulos, Goldwater and Steedman (2010) 76.1%
Logistic regression with features and LBFGS Berg-Kirkpatrick et al. (2010) 75.5%
Clark DMF Distributional clustering + morphology + frequency Clark (2003) alexc 71.2%*

* according to Christodoulopoulos, Goldwater and Steedman (2010)


References

Listed alphabetically.


See also