Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conferences in 2007"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Yes, submission deadlines are a good idea. See also the discussion in [[Talk:Workshops in 2007]]. --[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 14:50, 11 February 2007 (EST) | :Yes, submission deadlines are a good idea. See also the discussion in [[Talk:Workshops in 2007]]. --[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 14:50, 11 February 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==List in chronological order?== | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think it would make more sense to list conferences in date order rather than alphabetical order.[H Somers 13 April] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:57, 13 April 2007
Reorganize?
I think it would be nice to give the dates for conferences directly here, as well as links to the external homepage. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bond (talk • contribs) 16 November 2006.
- That seems like a good idea to me. I don't know the reason for the current system. Perhaps the intention was to provide a place to store permanent information about each conference, in case the external link ceases to function. By the way, you should Sign your posts. --Pdturney 10:32, 16 November 2006 (EST)
- Done.--Pdturney 18:56, 5 December 2006 (EST)
Include deadlines?
I think it would be nice to include submission deadlines as well and cross these out once they are passed. That looks a bit friendlier than crossing out the name of the workshop/conference.--Ioan 09:59, 8 February 2007 (EST)
- Yes, submission deadlines are a good idea. See also the discussion in Talk:Workshops in 2007. --Pdturney 14:50, 11 February 2007 (EST)
List in chronological order?
I think it would make more sense to list conferences in date order rather than alphabetical order.[H Somers 13 April]