Difference between revisions of "Talk:Industrial research groups"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:I guess an industrial research group is a research group that operates in, and is funded by industry as opposed to academia/government. Perhaps the title is ambiguous, could you suggest a better one? I don't see why the list needs to be country specific, but there is no harm in ordering by country. PS. you can sign your posts using <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. - [[User:Francis Tyers|Francis Tyers]] 05:09, 15 November 2006 (EST) | :I guess an industrial research group is a research group that operates in, and is funded by industry as opposed to academia/government. Perhaps the title is ambiguous, could you suggest a better one? I don't see why the list needs to be country specific, but there is no harm in ordering by country. PS. you can sign your posts using <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. - [[User:Francis Tyers|Francis Tyers]] 05:09, 15 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks for the tip :)<br> | ||
| + | As for the title - perhaps, it's ok, after all. Probably, to better understand my point, you could take a look at [[http://www.appliedlinguisticsgroup.com]]. Does it qualify to get in this list, for example?<br> | ||
| + | [[User:SlaKc|SlaKc]] 14:34, 16 November 2006 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 13:34, 16 November 2006
Could you answer a few questions?
- What is an "industrial research group" for ACLWiki? Does it need any specific requisites to be listed here, and are there any restrictions?
- Does the list have to be country-specific?
Thanks. SlaKc 14:29, 16 November 2006 (EST)
- I guess an industrial research group is a research group that operates in, and is funded by industry as opposed to academia/government. Perhaps the title is ambiguous, could you suggest a better one? I don't see why the list needs to be country specific, but there is no harm in ordering by country. PS. you can sign your posts using ~~~~. - Francis Tyers 05:09, 15 November 2006 (EST)
Thanks for the tip :)
As for the title - perhaps, it's ok, after all. Probably, to better understand my point, you could take a look at [[1]]. Does it qualify to get in this list, for example?
SlaKc 14:34, 16 November 2006 (EST)