Difference between revisions of "Press"

From NMLWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
* 10/4/2008 The Washington Post [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/03/AR2008100303569.html "CORRECTIONS"].
+
* 10/4/2008 The Washington Post [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/03/AR2008100303569.html "CORRECTIONS"]. An Oct. 3 Weekend article on the National Museum of Language incorrectly said "The Tale of Genji" was written between 1001 and 1020 B.C. It was written between A.D. 1001 and 1020.
 +
 
  
 
* 10/3/2008 The Washington Post [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/02/AR2008100201163.html "Take Our Word: It's Worth a Look"] by Amy Orndorff.
 
* 10/3/2008 The Washington Post [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/02/AR2008100201163.html "Take Our Word: It's Worth a Look"] by Amy Orndorff.
  
 
* 9/2008 Language [http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/language/v084/84.3.falk.html  "National Museum of Language open for business"] Letter to the Editor by Amelia C. Murdoch.
 
* 9/2008 Language [http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/language/v084/84.3.falk.html  "National Museum of Language open for business"] Letter to the Editor by Amelia C. Murdoch.

Revision as of 09:34, 14 October 2008

  • 10/4/2008 The Washington Post "CORRECTIONS". An Oct. 3 Weekend article on the National Museum of Language incorrectly said "The Tale of Genji" was written between 1001 and 1020 B.C. It was written between A.D. 1001 and 1020.