Difference between revisions of "Question Answering (State of the art)"

From ACL Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 63: Line 63:
 
| 0.785
 
| 0.785
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| W&I (2015)
 +
| Wang and Ittycheriah (2015)
 +
| 0.746
 +
| 0.820
 
|}
 
|}
  
Line 77: Line 81:
 
* Severyn, Aliaksei and Moschitti, Alessandro. 2013. [http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D13-1044.pdf Automatic Feature Engineering for Answer Selection and Extraction]. In EMNLP 2013.
 
* Severyn, Aliaksei and Moschitti, Alessandro. 2013. [http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D13-1044.pdf Automatic Feature Engineering for Answer Selection and Extraction]. In EMNLP 2013.
 
* Lei Yu, Karl Moritz Hermann, Phil Blunsom, and Stephen Pulman. 2014 [http://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.1632v1.pdf Deep Learning for Answer Sentence Selection]. In NIPS deep learning workshop.
 
* Lei Yu, Karl Moritz Hermann, Phil Blunsom, and Stephen Pulman. 2014 [http://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.1632v1.pdf Deep Learning for Answer Sentence Selection]. In NIPS deep learning workshop.
 
+
* Zhiguo Wang and Abraham Ittycheriah. 2015 [http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.02628 FAQ-based Question Answering via Word Alignment]. In eprint arXiv:1507.02628.
 
[[Category:State of the art]]
 
[[Category:State of the art]]

Revision as of 05:52, 10 July 2015

Answer Sentence Selection

The task of answer sentence selection is designed for the open-domain question answering setting. Given a question and a set of candidate sentences, the task is to choose the correct sentence that contains the exact answer and can sufficiently support the answer choice.


Algorithm Reference MAP MRR
Punyakanok (2004) Wang et al. (2007) 0.419 0.494
Cui (2005) Wang et al. (2007) 0.427 0.526
Wang (2007) Wang et al. (2007) 0.603 0.685
H&S (2010) Heilman and Smith (2010) 0.609 0.692
W&M (2010) Wang and Manning (2010) 0.595 0.695
Yao (2013) Yao et al. (2013) 0.631 0.748
S&M (2013) Severyn and Moschitti (2013) 0.678 0.736
Shnarch (2013) - Backward Shnarch (2013) 0.686 0.754
Yih (2013) - LCLR Yih et al. (2013) 0.709 0.770
Yu (2014) - TRAIN-ALL bigram+count Yu et al. (2014) 0.711 0.785
W&I (2015) Wang and Ittycheriah (2015) 0.746 0.820


References