Difference between revisions of "Paraphrase Identification (State of the art)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
! Algorithm | ! Algorithm | ||
! Reference | ! Reference | ||
| − | ! | + | ! Description |
! Accuracy | ! Accuracy | ||
! F | ! F | ||
Revision as of 12:49, 24 March 2009
- Microsoft Research Paraphrase Corpus (MSRP)
- see Dolan, Quirk, and Brockett (2004)
- train: 4,076 sentence pairs (2,753 positive: 67.5%)
- test: 1,725 sentence pairs (1,147 positive: 66.5%)
Sample data
- Sentence 1: Amrozi accused his brother, whom he called "the witness", of deliberately distorting his evidence.
- Sentence 2: Referring to him as only "the witness", Amrozi accused his brother of deliberately distorting his evidence.
- Class: 1 (true paraphrase)
Table of results
| Algorithm | Reference | Description | Accuracy | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCS | Mihalcea et al. (2006) | unsupervised combination of several word similarity measures | 70.3% | 81.3% |
References
Dolan, B., Quirk, C., and Brockett, C. (2004). [http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/C/C04/C04-1051.pdf Unsupervised construction of large paraphrase corpora: Exploiting massively parallel news sources], Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2004), Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 350-356.
Mihalcea, R., Corley, C., and Strapparava, C. (2006). Corpus-based and knowledge-based measures of text semantic similarity, Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2006), Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 775-780.