Difference between revisions of "DIRT Paraphrase Collection - RTE Users"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| Original DIRT db | | Original DIRT db | ||
| Elaborate T sentence with DIRT-implied entailments | | Elaborate T sentence with DIRT-implied entailments | ||
− | | precision/recall in RTE4: | + | | precision/recall in RTE4:<br> |
− | boeing run1: 67%/6%; | + | boeing run1: 67%/6%;<br> |
boeing run2: 54%/30% | boeing run2: 54%/30% | ||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left" | |- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left" |
Revision as of 08:09, 8 April 2009
Participants | Campaign | Version | Specific usage description | Evalutations / Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Boeing | RTE4 | Original DIRT db | Elaborate T sentence with DIRT-implied entailments | precision/recall in RTE4: boeing run1: 67%/6%; |
BIU | RTE4 | We used the canonical DIRT rulebase version of Szpektor and Dagan (RANLP 2007), and considered top 25 rules. | Verb-net + Nom-lex plus + Parc Polarity Lexicon + DIRT Paraphrase Collection = +0.9% on RTE-4 ablation tests. | |
UAIC | RTE4 | Data taken from the RTE4 proceedings. Participants are recommended to add further information. | ||
Uoeltg | RTE4 | Data taken from the RTE4 proceedings. Participants are recommended to add further information. | ||
New user | Participants are encouraged to contribute. |
Total: 4 |
---|
Return to RTE Knowledge Resources