Difference between revisions of "User talk:Armin"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: == WSD Evaluation == I think your new section (Word sense disambiguation - WSD Evaluation) should be deleted. (1) There is already a link to the Wikipedia article in the existing section ...) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think your new section (Word sense disambiguation - WSD Evaluation) should be deleted. (1) There is already a link to the Wikipedia article in the existing section "External links" and (2) "A 2010 Paper with new ideas" is conspicuous self-promotion. There is no reason to treat this paper any differently from the other papers in the References section. Presumably every conference or journal paper has some new ideas, or it would be rejected in the reviewing process.--[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 18:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | I think your new section (Word sense disambiguation - WSD Evaluation) should be deleted. (1) There is already a link to the Wikipedia article in the existing section "External links" and (2) "A 2010 Paper with new ideas" is conspicuous self-promotion. There is no reason to treat this paper any differently from the other papers in the References section. Presumably every conference or journal paper has some new ideas, or it would be rejected in the reviewing process.--[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 18:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: I reverted to the earlier version of the WSD article. You are welcome to add references to the article, but you should treat your own papers no differently from any other reference.--[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 18:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:46, 4 January 2011
WSD Evaluation
I think your new section (Word sense disambiguation - WSD Evaluation) should be deleted. (1) There is already a link to the Wikipedia article in the existing section "External links" and (2) "A 2010 Paper with new ideas" is conspicuous self-promotion. There is no reason to treat this paper any differently from the other papers in the References section. Presumably every conference or journal paper has some new ideas, or it would be rejected in the reviewing process.--Pdturney 18:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- I reverted to the earlier version of the WSD article. You are welcome to add references to the article, but you should treat your own papers no differently from any other reference.--Pdturney 18:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)