Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conferences in 2007"

From ACL Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
::That seems like a good idea to me. I don't know the reason for the current system. Perhaps the intention was to provide a place to store permanent information about each conference, in case the external link ceases to function. By the way, you should [[Guidelines for editing|Sign your posts]]. --[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 10:32, 16 November 2006 (EST)
 
::That seems like a good idea to me. I don't know the reason for the current system. Perhaps the intention was to provide a place to store permanent information about each conference, in case the external link ceases to function. By the way, you should [[Guidelines for editing|Sign your posts]]. --[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 10:32, 16 November 2006 (EST)
 +
 +
::::Done.--[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 18:56, 5 December 2006 (EST)
 +
 +
==Include deadlines?==
 +
 +
I think it would be nice to include submission deadlines as well and cross these out
 +
once they are passed. That looks a bit friendlier than crossing out the name of the workshop/conference.--[[User:Ioan|Ioan]] 09:59, 8 February 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
:Yes, submission deadlines are a good idea. See also the discussion in [[Talk:Workshops in 2007]]. --[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 14:50, 11 February 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
==List in chronological order?==
 +
 +
I think it would make more sense to list conferences in date order rather than alphabetical order.[H Somers 13 April]

Latest revision as of 16:57, 13 April 2007

Reorganize?

I think it would be nice to give the dates for conferences directly here, as well as links to the external homepage. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bond (talkcontribs) 16 November 2006.

That seems like a good idea to me. I don't know the reason for the current system. Perhaps the intention was to provide a place to store permanent information about each conference, in case the external link ceases to function. By the way, you should Sign your posts. --Pdturney 10:32, 16 November 2006 (EST)
Done.--Pdturney 18:56, 5 December 2006 (EST)

Include deadlines?

I think it would be nice to include submission deadlines as well and cross these out once they are passed. That looks a bit friendlier than crossing out the name of the workshop/conference.--Ioan 09:59, 8 February 2007 (EST)

Yes, submission deadlines are a good idea. See also the discussion in Talk:Workshops in 2007. --Pdturney 14:50, 11 February 2007 (EST)

List in chronological order?

I think it would make more sense to list conferences in date order rather than alphabetical order.[H Somers 13 April]