Difference between revisions of "WordNet - RTE Users"

From ACL Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 35: Line 35:
 
| RTE4
 
| RTE4
 
| 3.0
 
| 3.0
| Hypernyms, antonyms, indexWords(N,V,Adj,Adv)
+
| Hypernyms, antonyms, indexWords (N,V,Adj,Adv)
 
| Used, but no evaluation performed
 
| Used, but no evaluation performed
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
Line 60: Line 60:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Recommended editing from partecipants themselves''
+
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
| DLSIUAES
 
| DLSIUAES
Line 66: Line 66:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Recommended editing from partecipants themselves''
+
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
| EMORY
 
| EMORY
Line 72: Line 72:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Recommended editing from partecipants themselves''
+
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
| FSC
 
| FSC
Line 78: Line 78:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Recommended editing from partecipants themselves''
+
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
| IIT
 
| IIT
Line 84: Line 84:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Recommended editing from partecipants themselves''
+
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
| IPD
 
| IPD
Line 90: Line 90:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Recommended editing from partecipants themselves''
+
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
| OAQA
 
| OAQA
Line 96: Line 96:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Recommended editing from partecipants themselves''
+
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
| QUANTA
 
| QUANTA
Line 102: Line 102:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Recommended editing from partecipants themselves''
+
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
| SAGAN
 
| SAGAN
Line 108: Line 108:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Recommended editing from partecipants themselves''
+
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
| Stanford
 
| Stanford
Line 114: Line 114:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Recommended editing from partecipants themselves''
+
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 +
| UAIC
 +
| RTE4
 +
|
 
|  
 
|  
 +
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 +
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 +
| UMD
 
| RTE4
 
| RTE4
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Recommended editing from partecipants themselves''
+
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
|  
+
| UNED
 
| RTE4
 
| RTE4
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Recommended editing from partecipants themselves''
+
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
|  
+
| UOELTG
 
| RTE4
 
| RTE4
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Recommended editing from partecipants themselves''
+
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
|  
+
| UPC
 
| RTE4
 
| RTE4
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Recommended editing from partecipants themselves''
+
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
 +
| ''New user''
 
|  
 
|  
| RTE4
 
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
 
|  
| ''Data extracted from proceedings. Recommended editing from partecipants themselves''
+
| ''Partecipants are recommended to edit fields''
 
|}
 
|}
 
{|class="wikitable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin-left: 20px;"
 
{|class="wikitable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin-left: 20px;"

Revision as of 04:25, 6 April 2009


Partecipants Campaign Version Specific usage description Evalutations / Comments
Del Monte RTE3 3.0 Semantic relation between words No evaluation of the resource
AUEB RTE3 2.1 Synonymy resolution Replacing the words of H with their synonyms in T: on RTE3 data sets 2% improvement
Boeing RTE4 2.0 Semantic relation between words No formal evaluation. Plays a role in most entailments found.
DFKI RTE4 3.0 Semantic relation between words No separate evaluation
CERES RTE4 3.0 Hypernyms, antonyms, indexWords (N,V,Adj,Adv) Used, but no evaluation performed
Cambridge RTE4 3.0 Meaning postulates from WordNet noun hyponymy, e.g. forall x: cat(x) -> animal(x) No systematic evaluation
BIU RTE4 3.0 Derived on the fly lexical entailment rules, using synonyms, hypernyms (up to two levels) and derivations. Also used as part of our novel lexical-syntactic resource 0.8% improvement in ablation test on RTE-4. Potential contribution is higher since this resource partially overlaps with the novel lexical syntactic rule base
FbkIrst RTE4 3.0 Lexical similarity No precise evaluation of the resource has been carried out. In our second run we used a combined system (EDITSneg + EDITSallbutneg), and we had an improvement of 0.6% in accuracy with respect to the first run in which only EDITSneg was used. EDITSallbutneg exploits lexical similarity (WordNet similarity), but we can’t affirm with precision that the improvement is due only to the use of WordNet
AUEB RTE4 Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
DLSIUAES RTE4 Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
EMORY RTE4 Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
FSC RTE4 Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
IIT RTE4 Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
IPD RTE4 Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
OAQA RTE4 Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
QUANTA RTE4 Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
SAGAN RTE4 Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
Stanford RTE4 Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
UAIC RTE4 Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
UMD RTE4 Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
UNED RTE4 Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
UOELTG RTE4 Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
UPC RTE4 Data extracted from proceedings. Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
New user Partecipants are recommended to edit fields
Total: 8