Difference between revisions of "Graph Parsing (State of the Art)"
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
= AMR: Abstract Meaning Representation = | = AMR: Abstract Meaning Representation = | ||
+ | |||
+ | = CCD: Combinatory Categorial Grammar Dependencies = | ||
= EDS: Elementary Dependency Structures = | = EDS: Elementary Dependency Structures = | ||
= SDP: Semantic Dependency Parsing = | = SDP: Semantic Dependency Parsing = |
Revision as of 11:57, 9 May 2016
Background and Motivation
Graphs exceeding the formal complexity of rooted trees are of growing relevance to much NLP research. We interpret the term graph parsing broadly as mapping from surface strings to graph-structured target representations, which typically provide some level of syntactico-semantic analysis. Although formally well-understood in graph theory, there is substantial variation in the types of linguistic graphs, as well as in the interpretation of various structural properties. To provide a common terminology and transparent statistics across different collections of graphs in NLP, we propose to establish a ‘catalogue’ of graph banks and associated parsing results.
We anticipate a bit of a cottage industry in linguistic graph banks and graph processing tasks over the next few years, which may make it difficult to keep track of contentful similarities and differences across frameworks and approaches. This page is intended to stimulate community work towards an up-to-date resource combining the following components: (a) formal definitions of (relevant) structural graph properties; (b) in-depth descriptions of how these apply to different graph banks; (c) constantly growing surveys of graph bank statistics; and (d) a continuously evolving record of state-of-the-art processing results.
This page was initiated by Marco Kuhlmann and Stephan Oepen, and for the time being (mid-May 2016) is very much a work in progress. We intend to have a first complete draft available for community review by early June 2016.