Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From ACL Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
classified geographically like the other organisations. I think they should go straight on the first page,
 
classified geographically like the other organisations. I think they should go straight on the first page,
 
because they are an important part of ACL. --[[User:Ioan|Ioan]] 09:53, 17 December 2006 (EST)
 
because they are an important part of ACL. --[[User:Ioan|Ioan]] 09:53, 17 December 2006 (EST)
 +
 +
::There's no requirement to classify them geographically like the other organisations. But if you want to put them somewhere else, go ahead. Be bold. --[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 10:27, 17 December 2006 (EST)
  
 
== Companies? ==
 
== Companies? ==

Revision as of 08:27, 17 December 2006

SIGs?

I couldnt find links to the ACL special interest groups. I guess a good place is the first page under topics. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ioan (talkcontribs) 17 December 2006.

I added a link on the main page, under Organizations, departments, ... --Pdturney 09:31, 17 December 2006 (EST)

I am not sure that's the appropriate section. There is only about two dozens of SIGs, and they are not classified geographically like the other organisations. I think they should go straight on the first page, because they are an important part of ACL. --Ioan 09:53, 17 December 2006 (EST)

There's no requirement to classify them geographically like the other organisations. But if you want to put them somewhere else, go ahead. Be bold. --Pdturney 10:27, 17 December 2006 (EST)

Companies?

How about a bullet for commercial companies handling NLP tasks?

I added "companies" to "Organizations, departments, institutions, groups". By the way, please sign your messages by clicking on the button in edit mode that looks like a signature. The editor automatically expands it to your user name and the current date and time. --Pdturney 08:38, 31 October 2006 (EST)

Favicon?

The ACL favicon is not being displayed. Is this on purpose? --Grano 15:19, 31 October 2006 (EST)

It's working now. Thanks for bringing it to our attention. --Pdturney 19:39, 31 October 2006 (EST)