Difference between revisions of "Talk:Workshops in 2007"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Yes, that seems reasonable. I suppose one might want to sort them (1) by conference date, (2) by paper submission date, or (3) alphabetically. I wonder if there's an easy way to let the reader choose the sorting order? --[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 08:44, 8 February 2007 (EST) | :Yes, that seems reasonable. I suppose one might want to sort them (1) by conference date, (2) by paper submission date, or (3) alphabetically. I wonder if there's an easy way to let the reader choose the sorting order? --[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 08:44, 8 February 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::We could have either three sections on this page, or three articles [[Workshops in 2007 by date]], [[Workshops in 2007 by name]] etc. I'd probably err on the side of sections, although it would be a nuisance to maintain. I wonder if there is a way to do it with templates. - [[User:Francis Tyers|Francis Tyers]] 14:44, 8 February 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 12:44, 8 February 2007
Might it be better to have these organised by date? - Francis Tyers 06:14, 8 February 2007 (EST)
- Yes, that seems reasonable. I suppose one might want to sort them (1) by conference date, (2) by paper submission date, or (3) alphabetically. I wonder if there's an easy way to let the reader choose the sorting order? --Pdturney 08:44, 8 February 2007 (EST)
- We could have either three sections on this page, or three articles Workshops in 2007 by date, Workshops in 2007 by name etc. I'd probably err on the side of sections, although it would be a nuisance to maintain. I wonder if there is a way to do it with templates. - Francis Tyers 14:44, 8 February 2007 (EST)