Difference between revisions of "Talk:Books"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: I don't think we want to limit what books are allowed, as long as they are relevant to CL and NLP. I suggest that we just let the list grow naturally. When it gets too big, we can break it up into smaller pieces. When it gets too messy, we can impose structure on it. Maybe it's already gotten too messy? If you would like to impose some structure on it now, please proceed. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Be_bold_in_updating_pages Be bold]. --[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 09:17, 17 December 2006 (EST) | :: I don't think we want to limit what books are allowed, as long as they are relevant to CL and NLP. I suggest that we just let the list grow naturally. When it gets too big, we can break it up into smaller pieces. When it gets too messy, we can impose structure on it. Maybe it's already gotten too messy? If you would like to impose some structure on it now, please proceed. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Be_bold_in_updating_pages Be bold]. --[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 09:17, 17 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Oops, we seem to somehow have lost two key references... --[[User:Ioan|Ioan]] 06:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:38, 14 October 2008
Categorisation
It is a bit unclear what kind of books could be added to this list. Certainly this can be a large list, and we need some kind of categorisation. Is there any useful one? It would be nice to use one that could be usedon other pages as well. --Ioan 04:25, 17 December 2006 (EST)
- I don't think we want to limit what books are allowed, as long as they are relevant to CL and NLP. I suggest that we just let the list grow naturally. When it gets too big, we can break it up into smaller pieces. When it gets too messy, we can impose structure on it. Maybe it's already gotten too messy? If you would like to impose some structure on it now, please proceed. Be bold. --Pdturney 09:17, 17 December 2006 (EST)
Oops, we seem to somehow have lost two key references... --Ioan 06:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC)