Difference between revisions of "DIRT Paraphrase Collection - RTE Users"

Revision as of 05:21, 22 December 2009

Participants*	Campaign	Version	Specific usage description	Evaluations / Comments
BIU	RTE5		We used the canonical DIRT rulebase version of Szpektor and Dagan (RANLP 2007), and considered top 25 rules.	Ablation test performed. Positive impact of the resource: +1.33% accuracy on two-way task.
Boeing	RTE5		Verb paraphrases	Ablation test performed. Negative impact of the resource on two-way task: -1.17% accuracy. Null impact of the resource on three-way task.
UAIC	RTE5		Use of DIRT relations to map verbs in T with verbs in H	Ablation test performed. Positive impact of the resource: +0.17% accuracy on two-way, +0.33% on three-way task.
BIU	RTE4		We used the canonical DIRT rulebase version of Szpektor and Dagan (RANLP 2007), and considered top 25 rules.	+0.9% on RTE-4 ablation tests
Boeing	RTE4	Original DIRT db	Elaborate T sentence with DIRT-implied entailments	precision/recall in RTE4: boeing run1: 67%/6%; boeing run2: 54%/30%
UAIC	RTE4			Data taken from the RTE4 proceedings. Participants are recommended to add further information.
Uoeltg	RTE4			Data taken from the RTE4 proceedings. Participants are recommended to add further information.
UIUC	RTE3		Paired verb/argument patterns
New user				Participants are encouraged to contribute.

Total: 8

[*] For further information about participants, click here: RTE Challenges - Data about participants

   Return to RTE Knowledge Resources

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-When not otherwise specified, the data about version, usage and evaluation of the resource have been provided by participants themselves.<br>
 <br />
 {|class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1"