Difference between revisions of "ESL Synonym Questions (State of the art)"

From ACL Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Shoes521 (Talk); changed back to last version by Pdturney)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
In the fashion life, sweet, pleasant style http://www.toptbshop.com/Tory-Burch-Heel-shoes_6_1.htm is a lot of girls to pursue fashion elements, a pleasant little http://www.toptbshop.com/Tory-Burch-Reva-Flats_9_1.htm dress how can a beautiful bag to decorate it! Let me http://www.toptbshop.com/Tory-Burch-New-Arrival_7_1.htm introduce you to several popular http://www.toptbshop.com/Tory-Burch-Heel-shoes_6_1.htm bag to match your dress it sweet and pleasant!This D-shaped large bag is very cool fashion, with the gold chain as a decoration. On a simple bag with clothes with http://www.toptbshop.com/Tory-Burch-Flip-Flops_4_1.htm flowers appropriate.
+
* ESL = English as a Second Language
 +
* 50 multiple-choice synonym questions; 4 choices per question
 +
* each question includes a sentence, providing context for the question
 +
* ESL questions available on request from [http://www.apperceptual.com/ Peter Turney]
 +
* introduced in Turney (2001) as a way of evaluating algorithms for measuring degree of similarity between words
 +
* subsequently used by many other researchers
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Sample question ==
 +
 
 +
::{| border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1"
 +
|-
 +
! Stem:
 +
|
 +
| "A '''rusty''' nail is not as strong as a clean, new one."
 +
|-
 +
! Choices:
 +
| (a)
 +
| corroded
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| (b)
 +
| black
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| (c)
 +
| dirty
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
| (d)
 +
| painted
 +
|-
 +
! Solution:
 +
| (a)
 +
| corroded
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Table of results ==
 +
 
 +
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="1" width="100%"
 +
|-
 +
! Algorithm
 +
! Reference for algorithm
 +
! Reference for experiment
 +
! Type
 +
! Correct
 +
! 95% confidence
 +
|-
 +
| Random
 +
| Random guessing
 +
| 1 / 4 = 25.00%
 +
| Random
 +
| 25.00%
 +
| 14.63-40.34%
 +
|-
 +
| RES
 +
| Resnik (1995)
 +
| Jarmasz and Szpakowicz (2003)
 +
| Hybrid
 +
| 32.66%
 +
| 21.21-48.77%
 +
|-
 +
| LC
 +
| Leacock and Chodrow (1998)
 +
| Jarmasz and Szpakowicz (2003)
 +
| Lexicon-based
 +
| 36.00%
 +
| 22.92-50.81%
 +
|-
 +
| LIN
 +
| Lin (1998)
 +
| Jarmasz and Szpakowicz (2003)
 +
| Hybrid
 +
| 36.00%
 +
| 22.92-50.81%
 +
|-
 +
| JC
 +
| Jiang and Conrath (1997)
 +
| Jarmasz and Szpakowicz (2003)
 +
| Hybrid
 +
| 36.00%
 +
| 22.92-50.81%
 +
|-
 +
| HSO
 +
| Hirst and St.-Onge (1998)
 +
| Jarmasz and Szpakowicz (2003)
 +
| Lexicon-based
 +
| 62.00%
 +
| 47.18-75.35%
 +
|-
 +
| PMI-IR
 +
| Turney (2001)
 +
| Turney (2001)
 +
| Corpus-based
 +
| 74.00%
 +
| 59.66-85.37%
 +
|-
 +
| PMI-IR
 +
| Terra and Clarke (2003)
 +
| Terra and Clarke (2003)
 +
| Corpus-based
 +
| 80.00%
 +
| 66.28-89.97%
 +
|-
 +
| JS
 +
| Jarmasz and Szpakowicz (2003)
 +
| Jarmasz and Szpakowicz (2003)
 +
| Lexicon-based
 +
| 82.00%
 +
| 68.56-91.42%
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Explanation of table ==
 +
 
 +
* '''Algorithm''' = name of algorithm
 +
* '''Reference for algorithm''' = where to find out more about given algorithm
 +
* '''Reference for experiment''' = where to find out more about evaluation of given algorithm with ESL questions
 +
* '''Type''' = general type of algorithm: corpus-based, lexicon-based, hybrid
 +
* '''Correct''' = percent of 80 questions that given algorithm answered correctly
 +
* '''95% confidence''' = confidence interval calculated using [http://www.quantitativeskills.com/sisa/statistics/onemean.htm Binomial Exact Test]
 +
* table rows sorted in order of increasing percent correct
 +
* several WordNet-based similarity measures are implemented in [http://www.d.umn.edu/~tpederse/ Ted Pedersen]'s [http://www.d.umn.edu/~tpederse/similarity.html WordNet::Similarity] package
 +
* PMI-IR = Pointwise Mutual Information - Information Retrieval
 +
* Terra and Clarke (2003) call the ESL Synonym Questions "TS1"
 +
 
 +
== Caveats ==
 +
 
 +
* the performance of a corpus-based algorithm depends on the corpus, so the difference in performance between two corpus-based systems may be due to the different corpora, rather than the different algorithms
 +
* the ESL questions include nouns, verbs, and adjectives, but some of the WordNet-based algorithms were only designed to work with nouns
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== References ==
 +
 
 +
Hirst, G., and St-Onge, D. (1998). [http://mirror.eacoss.org/documentation/ITLibrary/IRIS/Data/1997/Hirst/Lexical/1997-Hirst-Lexical.pdf Lexical chains as representation of context for the detection and correction of malapropisms]. In C. Fellbaum (ed.), ''WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database''. Cambridge: MIT Press, 305-332.
 +
 
 +
Jarmasz, M., and Szpakowicz, S. (2003). [http://www.csi.uottawa.ca/~szpak/recent_papers/TR-2003-01.pdf Roget’s thesaurus and semantic similarity], ''Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP-03)'', Borovets, Bulgaria, September, pp. 212-219.
 +
 
 +
Jiang, J.J., and Conrath, D.W. (1997). [http://wortschatz.uni-leipzig.de/~sbordag/aalw05/Referate/03_Assoziationen_BudanitskyResnik/Jiang_Conrath_97.pdf Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy]. ''Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics'', Taiwan.
 +
 
 +
Leacock, C., and Chodorow, M. (1998). Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification. In C. Fellbaum (ed.), ''WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database''. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 265-283.
 +
 
 +
Lin, D. (1998). [http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~lindek/papers/sim.pdf An information-theoretic definition of similarity]. ''Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-98)'', Madison, WI, pp. 296-304.
 +
 
 +
Resnik, P. (1995). [http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/resnik95using.html Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity]. ''Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95)'', Montreal, pp. 448-453.
 +
 
 +
Terra, E., and Clarke, C.L.A. (2003). [http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/N/N03/N03-1032.pdf Frequency estimates for statistical word similarity measures]. ''Proceedings of the Human Language Technology and North American Chapter of Association of Computational Linguistics Conference 2003 (HLT/NAACL 2003)'', pp. 244–251.
 +
 
 +
Turney, P.D. (2001). [http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.LG/0212033 Mining the Web for synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL]. ''Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML-2001)'', Freiburg, Germany, pp. 491-502.
 +
 
 +
== See also ==
 +
 
 +
* [[Attributional and Relational Similarity (State of the art)]]
 +
* [[SAT Analogy Questions]]
 +
* [[TOEFL Synonym Questions]]
 +
* [[State of the art]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Category:State of the art]]

Revision as of 05:16, 20 September 2011

  • ESL = English as a Second Language
  • 50 multiple-choice synonym questions; 4 choices per question
  • each question includes a sentence, providing context for the question
  • ESL questions available on request from Peter Turney
  • introduced in Turney (2001) as a way of evaluating algorithms for measuring degree of similarity between words
  • subsequently used by many other researchers


Sample question

Stem: "A rusty nail is not as strong as a clean, new one."
Choices: (a) corroded
(b) black
(c) dirty
(d) painted
Solution: (a) corroded


Table of results

Algorithm Reference for algorithm Reference for experiment Type Correct 95% confidence
Random Random guessing 1 / 4 = 25.00% Random 25.00% 14.63-40.34%
RES Resnik (1995) Jarmasz and Szpakowicz (2003) Hybrid 32.66% 21.21-48.77%
LC Leacock and Chodrow (1998) Jarmasz and Szpakowicz (2003) Lexicon-based 36.00% 22.92-50.81%
LIN Lin (1998) Jarmasz and Szpakowicz (2003) Hybrid 36.00% 22.92-50.81%
JC Jiang and Conrath (1997) Jarmasz and Szpakowicz (2003) Hybrid 36.00% 22.92-50.81%
HSO Hirst and St.-Onge (1998) Jarmasz and Szpakowicz (2003) Lexicon-based 62.00% 47.18-75.35%
PMI-IR Turney (2001) Turney (2001) Corpus-based 74.00% 59.66-85.37%
PMI-IR Terra and Clarke (2003) Terra and Clarke (2003) Corpus-based 80.00% 66.28-89.97%
JS Jarmasz and Szpakowicz (2003) Jarmasz and Szpakowicz (2003) Lexicon-based 82.00% 68.56-91.42%


Explanation of table

  • Algorithm = name of algorithm
  • Reference for algorithm = where to find out more about given algorithm
  • Reference for experiment = where to find out more about evaluation of given algorithm with ESL questions
  • Type = general type of algorithm: corpus-based, lexicon-based, hybrid
  • Correct = percent of 80 questions that given algorithm answered correctly
  • 95% confidence = confidence interval calculated using Binomial Exact Test
  • table rows sorted in order of increasing percent correct
  • several WordNet-based similarity measures are implemented in Ted Pedersen's WordNet::Similarity package
  • PMI-IR = Pointwise Mutual Information - Information Retrieval
  • Terra and Clarke (2003) call the ESL Synonym Questions "TS1"

Caveats

  • the performance of a corpus-based algorithm depends on the corpus, so the difference in performance between two corpus-based systems may be due to the different corpora, rather than the different algorithms
  • the ESL questions include nouns, verbs, and adjectives, but some of the WordNet-based algorithms were only designed to work with nouns


References

Hirst, G., and St-Onge, D. (1998). Lexical chains as representation of context for the detection and correction of malapropisms. In C. Fellbaum (ed.), WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge: MIT Press, 305-332.

Jarmasz, M., and Szpakowicz, S. (2003). Roget’s thesaurus and semantic similarity, Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP-03), Borovets, Bulgaria, September, pp. 212-219.

Jiang, J.J., and Conrath, D.W. (1997). Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics, Taiwan.

Leacock, C., and Chodorow, M. (1998). Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification. In C. Fellbaum (ed.), WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 265-283.

Lin, D. (1998). An information-theoretic definition of similarity. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-98), Madison, WI, pp. 296-304.

Resnik, P. (1995). Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95), Montreal, pp. 448-453.

Terra, E., and Clarke, C.L.A. (2003). Frequency estimates for statistical word similarity measures. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology and North American Chapter of Association of Computational Linguistics Conference 2003 (HLT/NAACL 2003), pp. 244–251.

Turney, P.D. (2001). Mining the Web for synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL. Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML-2001), Freiburg, Germany, pp. 491-502.

See also

Retrieved from "https://aclweb.org/aclwiki/index.php?title=ESL_Synonym_Questions_(State_of_the_art)&oldid=8983"