WordNet - RTE Users

Partecipants	Campaign	Version	Specific usage description	Evalutations / Comments
Del Monte	RTE3	3.0	Semantic relation between words	No evaluation of the resource
AUEB	RTE3	2.1	Synonymy resolution	Replacing the words of H with their synonyms in T: on RTE3 data sets 2% improvement
Boeing	RTE4	2.0	Semantic relation between words	No formal evaluation. Plays a role in most entailments found.
DFKI	RTE4	3.0	Semantic relation between words	No separate evaluation
CERES	RTE4	3.0	Hypernyms, antonyms, indexWords(N,V,Adj,Adv)	Used, but no evaluation performed
Cambridge	RTE4	3.0	Meaning postulates from WordNet noun hyponymy, e.g. forall x: cat(x) -> animal(x)	No systematic evaluation
BIU	RTE4	3.0	Derived on the fly lexical entailment rules, using synonyms, hypernyms (up to two levels) and derivations. Also used as part of our novel lexical-syntactic resource	0.8% improvement in ablation test on RTE-4. Potential contribution is higher since this resource partially overlaps with the novel lexical syntactic rule base
FbkIrst	RTE4	3.0	Lexical similarity	No precise evaluation of the resource has been carried out. In our second run we used a combined system (EDITSneg + EDITSallbutneg), and we had an improvement of 0.6% in accuracy with respect to the first run in which only EDITSneg was used. EDITSallbutneg exploits lexical similarity (WordNet similarity), but we can’t affirm with precision that the improvement is due only to the use of WordNet

Total: 8