RTE6 - Ablation Tests
Revision as of 05:17, 3 February 2011 by Amarchetti (talk | contribs)
The following table lists the results of the ablation tests (a mandatory track since the RTE5 campaign), submitted by participants to RTE6 .
Participants are kindly invited to check if all the inserted information is correct and complete.
Ablated Component | Ablation Run[1] | Resource impact - F1 | Resource Usage Description |
---|---|---|---|
WordNet | BIU1_abl-1 | 0.9 | No Word-Net. On Dev set: 39.18% (compared to 40.73% when WN is used) |
CatVar | BIU1_abl-2 | 0.63 | No CatVar. On Dev set achieved about 40.20% (compared to 40.73% when CatVar is used) |
Coreference resolver | BIU1_abl-3 | -0.88 | No coreference resolver
On Dev set 41.62% (Compared to 40.73% when Coreference resolver is used). This ablation test is an unusual ablation test, since it shows that the co-reference resolution component has a negative impact. |
DIRT | Boeing1_abl-1 | 3.97 | DIRT removed |
WordNet | Boeing1_abl-2 | 4.42 | No WordNet |
Name Normalization | budapestcad2_abl-2 | 0.65 | no name normalization was performed (e.g. George W. Bush -> Bush). |
Named Entities Recognition | budapestcad2_abl-3 | -1.23 | no NER |
WordNet | budapestcad2_abl-4 | -1.11 | No WordNet. (In the original run, WordNet was used to find the synonyms of words in the triplets, and additional triplets were generated from all possible combinations.) |
WordNet | deb_iitb1_abl-1 | 8.68 | Wordnet is albated in this test.No change of code required only wordnet module is removed while matching. |
VerbOcean | deb_iitb1_abl-2 | 1.87 | VerbOcean is albated in this test.No change of code required only VerbOcean module is removed while matching. |
WordNet | deb_iitb2_abl-1 | 7.9 | Wordnet is albated in this test.No change of code required only wordnet module is removed while matching. |
VerbOcean | deb_iitb2_abl-2 | 0.94 | VerbOcean is albated in this test.No change of code required only VerbOcean module is removed while matching. |
WordNet | deb_iitb3_abl-1 | 11.43 | Wordnet is albated in this test. No change of code required only wordnet module is removed while matching. |
WordNet | deb_iitb3_abl-2 | 2.54 | VerbOcean is albated in this test.No change of code required only VerbOcean module is removed while matching. |
POS-Tagger | DFKI1_abl-4 | 4.99 | No wordform/POS-tags included for the comparison. |
POS-Tagger | DFKI1_abl-6 | 2.22 | No named entity recognition for the comparison. |
WordNet | DFKI1_abl-7 | -0.23 | No WordNet similarity for the comparison. |
Coreference resolver | DFKI1_Main | -1.54 | Coreference resolution used for the comparison. |
WordNet | DirRelCond23_abl-1 | 8.43 | WordNet removed. Only basic word comparison used instead of word relations. |
Wikipedia | FBK_irst3_Main | -23.91 | This run is produced by the system configuration for run3 and uses rules extracted from Wikipedia |
Wikipedia | FBK_irst3_Main | -3.58 | This run is produced by the system configuration for run3 and uses rules extracted from Wikipedia with probability above 0.7 |
Proximity similarity dictionary of Dekang Lin | FBK_irst3_Main | -7.79 | This run is produced by the system configuration for run3 and uses rules extracted from proximity similarity dictionary of Dekang Lin |
WordNet | FBK_irst3_Main | -3.21 | This run is produced by the system configuration for run3 and uses rules extracted from WordNet |
WordNet | FBK_irst3_Main | -2.08 | This run is produced by the system configuration for run3 and uses rules extracted from WordNet with probability above 0.7 |
VerbOcean | FBK_irst3_Main | -4 | This run is produced by the system configuration for run3 and uses rules extracted from Verbocean |
Dependency similarity dictionary of Dekang Lin | FBK_irst3_Main | -13.56 | This run is produced by the system configuration for run3 and uses rules extracted from dependency similarity dictionary of Dekang Lin |
Dictionary of Named Entities Acronyms and Synonyms | IKOMA2_abl-3 | -0.76 | Remove synonym dictionaries: as acronym dictionary constructed automatically from the corpus and a synonym dictionary that contains geographical terms. |
WordNet | JU_CSE_TAC1_abl-1 | 13.29 | The Run-1 is based on the composition of lexical based RTE methods and Syntactic RTE Method. The lexical based RTE methods are: WordNet based unigram match, bigram match, longest common sub-sequence, skip-gram and stemming. Here we ablated the WordNet based unigram match only. |
WordNet | JU_CSE_TAC2_abl-1 | 10.19 | The Run-2 is based on the composition of lexical based RTE methods, Syntactic RTE Method, Chunk and Named Entity Methods. The lexical based RTE methods are: WordNet based unigram match, bigram match, longest common sub-sequence, skip-gram and stemming. Here we ablated the WordNet based unigram match only. |
WordNet | JU_CSE_TAC3_abl-1 | 3.86 | The Run-3 is based on the Support Vector Machine that uses twenty five features for lexical similarity, the output tag from a rule based syntactic two-way TE system as feature, and output from a rule based Chunk Module and Named Entity Module. The important lexical features that are used in the present system are: WordNet based unigram match, bigram match, longest common sub-sequence, skip-gram, stemming and lexical distance (17 features). Here we ablated the WordNet based unigram match only. |
LingPipe co-reference | PKUTM2_abl-1 | 0.17 | Lingpipe co-reference are removed, the experiment was based on named-entity, wordnet, verbocean |
VerbOcean | PKUTM2_abl-2 | 1.02 | Verbocean are removed, the experiment was based on named-entity, wordnet, co-reference |
LingPipe Named Entities | PKUTM2_abl-3 | 13.84 | Lingpipe named-entity are removed, the experiment was based on wordnet, co-reference, verbocean |
WordNet | saicnlp1_abl-1 | -0.02 | Ablation run, with WordNet stubbed. |
Shalmanesar Parser | Sangyan1_abl-1 | -1.76 | This ablation run was executed with the Shalmanesar parser ablated from our system. Our system uses the Shalmanesar Parser for Framenet frame assignment.
Our system required minor tweaking of the source code in order ablate Shalmanesar Parser. |
Footnotes
- ↑ For further information about participants, click here: RTE Challenges - Data about participants
Return to RTE Knowledge Resources