Parsing (State of the art)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- Performance measure: PARSEVAL - the evalb program
- Training data: sections 2-22 of Wall Street Journal corpus
- Testing data: section 23 of Wall Street Journal corpus
System name | Short description | Main publications | Software | Results (PARSEVAL) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Johnson & Charniak's Parser | Lexicalized N-Best PCFG + Discriminative re-reanking | Johnson and Charniak (2005) | download | 91.4% | works well also on Brown |
Collins' Parser | Lexicalized PCFG | Collins (1999), Bikel's Thesis [1] | Dan Bikel's implementation | ??? | |
Berkeley Parser | Automatically induced PCFG | Petrov, Barrett, Thibaux and Klein, ACL 2006 [2], Petrov and Klein, NAACL 2007 [3] | Berkeley Parser | 90.1% | works well also for Chinese and German |
Collins, M. (1999). Head-driven statistical models for natural language parsing. PhD Thesis, Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania.
Johnson, M., and Charniak, E. (2005). Coarse-to-fine n-best parsing and MaxEnt discriminative reranking. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 173–180, Ann Arbor, June 2005.