Difference between revisions of "Grady Ward's Moby Thesaurus - RTE Users"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
{|class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1" | {|class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1" | ||
|- bgcolor="#CDCDCD" | |- bgcolor="#CDCDCD" | ||
Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
| Ablation test performed. Positive impact of the two thesauri together: +2.83% accuracy on 2-way task. | | Ablation test performed. Positive impact of the two thesauri together: +2.83% accuracy on 2-way task. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|} | |} | ||
{|class="wikitable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin-left: 20px;" | {|class="wikitable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin-left: 20px;" |
Latest revision as of 09:40, 22 December 2009
Participants* | Campaign | Version | Specific usage description | Evaluations / Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
VENSES | RTE5 | Semantic fields are used as semantic similarity matching, in all cases of non identical lemmas. Used in combination with Roget's Thesaurus. | Ablation test performed. Positive impact of the two thesauri together: +2.83% accuracy on 2-way task. |
Total: 1 |
---|
[*] For further information about participants, click here: RTE Challenges - Data about participants
Return to RTE Knowledge Resources