Difference between revisions of "Framenet - RTE Users"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
{|class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1" | {|class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1" | ||
Latest revision as of 05:19, 22 December 2009
| Participants* | Campaign | Version | Specific usage description | Evaluations / Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLSIUAES | RTE5 | Frame-to-frame similarity metric. Used in combination with Wordnet. | Ablation test performed (WordNet+Framenet). Positive impact on two-way run: +1.16% accuracy. Negative impact on three-way run: -0.17% (the same for two-way derived). | |
| UB.dmirg | RTE5 | If two lexical items are covered in a single FrameNet frame, then the two items are treated as semantically related. The two verbs fly and pace, for instance, are covered in (inherited from) the same FrameNet frame Self_motion; therefore, we assume that these two verbs are semantically interchangeable. | Two ablation tests performed. The first for Framenet alone, the second for both WordNet and Framenet. Null impact of the resource(s) on two-way task for both ablations. | |
| DLSIUAES | RTE4 | Data taken from the RTE4 proceedings. Participants are recommended to add further information. | ||
| VENSES | RTE3 | Verb subcategorization | No evaluation of the resource | |
| New user | Participants are encouraged to contribute. |
| Total: 4 |
|---|
[*] For further information about participants, click here: RTE Challenges - Data about participants
Return to RTE Knowledge Resources