Difference between revisions of "Framenet - RTE Users"

Revision as of 05:45, 14 December 2009

When not otherwise specified, the data about version, usage and evaluation of the resource have been provided by participants themselves.

Participants*	Campaign	Specific usage description	Evaluations / Comments
DLSIUAES	RTE5	Frame-to-frame similarity metric. Used in combination with Wordnet.	Ablation test performed (WordNet+Framenet). Positive impact on two-way run: +1.16% accuracy. Negative impact on three-way run: -0.17% (the same for two-way derived).
UB.dmirg	RTE5	If two lexical items are covered in a single FrameNet frame, then the two items are treated as semantically related. The two verbs fly and pace, for instance, are covered in (inherited from) the same FrameNet frame Self_motion; therefore, we assume that these two verbs are semantically interchangeable.	Two ablation tests performed. The first for Framenet alone, the second for both WordNet and Framenet. Null impact of the resource(s) on two-way task for both ablations.
DLSIUAES	RTE4		Data taken from the RTE4 proceedings. Participants are recommended to add further information.
VENSES	RTE3	Verb subcategorization	No evaluation of the resource
New user			Participants are encouraged to contribute.

Total: 2

[*] For further information about participants, click here: RTE Challenges - Data about participants

   Return to RTE Knowledge Resources

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ! nowrap="nowrap"|Specific usage description
 ! nowrap="nowrap"|Evaluations / Comments
+|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"
+| DLSIUAES
+| RTE5
+|
+| Frame-to-frame similarity metric. Used in combination with Wordnet.
+| Ablation test performed (WordNet+Framenet). Positive impact on two-way run: +1.16% accuracy. Negative impact on three-way run: -0.17% (the same for two-way derived).
 |- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left"