Difference between revisions of "2009Q3 Reports: Program Chairs"
(New page: Program Chairs Report (Su, Jian and Wiebe, Jan) This year, we received a record number of 925 valid paper submissions -- a 24% submission increase over ACL-08: HLT -- with 569 full papers...) |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | This year, we received a record number of 925 valid | |
+ | paper submissions -- a 24% submission increase over ACL-08: HLT -- | ||
+ | with 569 full papers and 356 short papers. The significant | ||
+ | submission increase shows how vigorous our field is. | ||
− | + | 20 Area Chairs worked with 489 Program Committee members and 85 additional | |
+ | reviewers to come up with 2,551 reviews, in total, for the final | ||
+ | paper selection. 21% of the full paper submissions are accepted; | ||
+ | all of these will be presented orally. 26% of the short paper | ||
+ | submissions are accepted; some of these will be presented orally | ||
+ | and some will be given as poster presentations. While short papers | ||
+ | are distinguished from full papers in the proceedings, there is no | ||
+ | distinction in the proceedings between short papers presented | ||
+ | orally and those presented as poster presentations. | ||
+ | Furthermore, the short-paper posters are clustered together by | ||
+ | topic and assigned poster numbers, to provide better information | ||
+ | access for the audience and easier logistics for the Local | ||
+ | Arrangements Committee. | ||
− | + | Submissions and acceptances by areas | |
+ | are as following: | ||
− | |||
− | Full papers #sub #accepted | + | {| class="wikitable" border="1" |
− | Phonology/morphology, POS tagging and chunking, Word Segmentation 31 8 (26%) | + | |- |
− | Syntax and Parsing 49 14(29%) | + | ! Full papers |
− | Semantics 67 14(21%) | + | ! #sub |
− | Discourse, Dialogue and Pragmatics 43 9 (21%) | + | ! #accepted |
− | Summarization and Generation 44 8 (18%) | + | |- |
− | Statistical and Machine Learning Methods 40 6 (15%) | + | | Phonology/morphology, POS tagging and chunking, Word Segmentation |
− | Machine Translation 82 23(28%) | + | | 31 |
− | Information Retrieval 28 4 (14%) | + | | 8 (26%) |
− | Information Extraction 49 10(20%) | + | |- |
− | Sentiment Analysis, Opinion Mining and Text Classification 45 7 (16%) | + | | Syntax and Parsing |
− | Spoken Language Processing 19 6 (32%) | + | | 49 |
− | Question Answering 25 3 (12%) | + | | 14(29%) |
− | Text Mining and NLP Applications 21 4 (19%) | + | |- |
− | Language Resource 26 4 (15%) | + | | Semantics |
− | Total 569 120(21%) | + | | 67 |
+ | | 14(21%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Discourse, Dialogue and Pragmatics | ||
+ | | 43 | ||
+ | | 9 (21%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Summarization and Generation | ||
+ | | 44 | ||
+ | | 8 (18%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Statistical and Machine Learning Methods | ||
+ | | 40 | ||
+ | | 6 (15%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Machine Translation | ||
+ | | 82 | ||
+ | | 23(28%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Information Retrieval | ||
+ | | 28 | ||
+ | | 4 (14%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Information Extraction | ||
+ | | 49 | ||
+ | | 10(20%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Sentiment Analysis, Opinion Mining and Text Classification | ||
+ | | 45 | ||
+ | | 7 (16%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Spoken Language Processing | ||
+ | | 19 | ||
+ | | 6 (32%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Question Answering | ||
+ | | 25 | ||
+ | | 3 (12%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Text Mining and NLP Applications | ||
+ | | 21 | ||
+ | | 4 (19%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Language Resource | ||
+ | | 26 | ||
+ | | 4 (15%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Total | ||
+ | | 569 | ||
+ | | 120(21%) | ||
+ | |} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | {| class="wikitable" border="1" | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! Short papers | ||
+ | ! #sub | ||
+ | ! #accepted | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Phonology/morphology, POS tagging and chunking, Word Segmentation | ||
+ | | 16 | ||
+ | | 4 (25%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Syntax and Parsing | ||
+ | | 28 | ||
+ | | 8 (29%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Semantics | ||
+ | | 33 | ||
+ | | 9 (27%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Discourse, Dialogue and Pragmatics | ||
+ | | 21 | ||
+ | | 7 (33%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Summarization and Generation | ||
+ | | 24 | ||
+ | | 8 (33%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Statistical and Machine Learning Methods | ||
+ | | 21 | ||
+ | | 7 (33%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Machine Translation | ||
+ | | 57 | ||
+ | | 13(23%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Information Retrieval | ||
+ | | 26 | ||
+ | | 4 (15%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Information Extraction | ||
+ | | 26 | ||
+ | | 5 (19%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Sentiment Analysis, Opinion Mining and Text Classification | ||
+ | | 44 | ||
+ | | 13(30%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Spoken Language Processing | ||
+ | | 16 | ||
+ | | 5 (31%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Question Answering | ||
+ | | 25 | ||
+ | | 3 (25%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Text Mining and NLP Applications | ||
+ | | 16 | ||
+ | | 3 (19%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Language Resource | ||
+ | | 16 | ||
+ | | 4 (25%) | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Total | ||
+ | | 356 | ||
+ | | 93(26%) | ||
+ | |} | ||
− | Distribution for Full Papers | + | |
− | + | The geographical distribution of the first authors of all | |
− | Asia & Pacific 288 46 | + | submissions is shown below. We received submissions from 41 |
− | + | countries: about 51% from 20 countries in Asia | |
− | Australia 12 2 | + | Pacific, 27% from Canada, Cuba and the United States, 22% from 15 |
− | China 98 15 | + | countries in Europe, less than 1% from Argentina and one anonymous submission. |
− | Hong Kong S.A.R. 11 3 | + | |
− | India 20 1 | + | == Distribution for Full Papers == |
− | Indonesia 2 0 | + | |
− | Iran | + | {| class="wikitable" border="1" |
− | Israel 16 3 | + | |- |
− | Japan 73 12 | + | ! |
− | Malaysia 1 0 | + | ! # submission |
− | Oman 1 0 | + | ! # accepted |
− | Pakistan 1 0 | + | |- |
− | Philippines 2 0 | + | ! Asia & Pacific |
− | Republic of Korea 15 2 | + | ! 288 |
− | Singapore 15 7 | + | ! 46 |
− | Sri Lanka 1 0 | + | |- |
− | Taiwan 12 1 | + | ! colspan="3"| 19 Countries, 288/569= 50.62% of submissions, 46/120 = 38.33% of accepted papers |
− | Thailand 1 0 | + | |- |
− | Turkey 1 0 | + | | Australia |
− | Vietnam 2 0 | + | | 12 |
− | + | | 2 | |
− | Europe 115 18 | + | |- |
− | + | | China | |
− | Belgium 3 0 | + | | 98 |
− | Czech Republic 4 0 | + | | 15 |
− | Denmark 4 1 | + | |- |
− | Finland 1 0 | + | | Hong Kong S.A.R. |
− | France 12 1 | + | | 11 |
− | Germany 24 6 | + | | 3 |
− | Isle of Man 3 0 | + | |- |
− | Italy 10 1 | + | | India |
− | Netherlands 2 1 | + | | 20 |
− | Portugal 1 0 | + | | 1 |
− | Romania 2 0 | + | |- |
− | Russian Federation 2 0 | + | | Indonesia |
− | Spain 12 2 | + | | 2 |
− | Sweden 8 1 | + | | 0 |
− | Switzerland 3 1 | + | |- |
− | United Kindom 24 4 | + | | Iran |
− | + | | 4 | |
− | North America 163 56 | + | | 0 |
− | 2 countries, 163/569=28.65% of submissions, 56/120=46.67% of accepted papers | + | |- |
− | Canada 10 6 | + | | Israel |
− | United States 153 50 | + | | 16 |
− | + | | 3 | |
− | South America 2 0 | + | |- |
− | + | | Japan | |
− | Argentina 2 0 | + | | 73 |
− | + | | 12 | |
− | Anonymous 1 0 | + | |- |
− | + | | Malaysia | |
− | + | | 1 | |
− | Overall Total 569 120 | + | | 0 |
− | + | |- | |
− | Distribution for Short Papers | + | | Oman |
− | + | | 1 | |
− | Asia & Pacific 183 48 | + | | 0 |
− | 15 countries, 183/356=51.40% of submissions, 48/93=51.61% of accepted papers | + | |- |
− | Australia 6 2 | + | | Pakistan |
− | China 51 9 | + | | 1 |
− | Hong Kong S.A.R. 12 4 | + | | 0 |
− | India 16 5 | + | |- |
− | Japan 42 11 | + | | Philippines |
− | Malaysia 2 0 | + | | 2 |
− | New Zealand 1 0 | + | | 0 |
− | Republic of Korea 16 8 | + | |- |
− | Singapore 7 2 | + | | Republic of Korea |
− | Taiwan 15 3 | + | | 15 |
− | Thailand 2 0 | + | | 2 |
− | Vietnam 4 1 | + | |- |
− | Iran 2 0 | + | | Singapore |
− | Israel 3 1 | + | | 15 |
− | Turkey 4 2 | + | | 7 |
− | + | |- | |
− | Europe 85 21 | + | | Sri Lanka |
− | 14 countries, 85/356=23.88% of submissions, 21/93=22.58% of accepted papers | + | | 1 |
− | Belgium 1 1 | + | | 0 |
− | Czech Republic 4 2 | + | |- |
− | Denmark 4 0 | + | | Taiwan |
− | France 8 1 | + | | 12 |
− | Germany 21 7 | + | | 1 |
− | Isle of Man 4 0 | + | |- |
− | Italy 8 1 | + | | Thailand |
− | Netherlands 3 0 | + | | 1 |
− | Poland 1 0 | + | | 0 |
− | Portugal 1 1 | + | |- |
− | Spain 14 3 | + | | Turkey |
− | Sweden 2 0 | + | | 1 |
− | Switzerland 2 0 | + | | 0 |
− | United Kingdom 12 5 | + | |- |
− | + | | Vietnam | |
− | North America 88 24 | + | | 2 |
− | + | | 0 | |
− | Canada 5 2 | + | |- |
− | Cuba 1 0 | + | | colspan="3"| |
− | United States 82 22 | + | |- |
− | + | ! Europe | |
− | Overall Total 356 93 | + | ! 115 |
− | + | ! 18 | |
− | The best (student) papers will be announced at the end of the conference. | + | |- |
+ | ! colspan="3" |16 countries, 115/569 = 20.21% of submissions, 18/120 = 15.00% of accepted | ||
+ | papers | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Belgium | ||
+ | | 3 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Czech Republic | ||
+ | | 4 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Denmark | ||
+ | | 4 | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Finland | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | France | ||
+ | | 12 | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Germany | ||
+ | | 24 | ||
+ | | 6 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Isle of Man | ||
+ | | 3 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Italy | ||
+ | | 10 | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Netherlands | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Portugal | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Romania | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Russian Federation | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Spain | ||
+ | | 12 | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Sweden | ||
+ | | 8 | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Switzerland | ||
+ | | 3 | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | United Kindom | ||
+ | | 24 | ||
+ | | 4 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | colspan="3"| | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! North America | ||
+ | ! 163 | ||
+ | !56 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! colspan="3" |2 countries, 163/569=28.65% of submissions, 56/120=46.67% of accepted papers | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Canada | ||
+ | | 10 | ||
+ | | 6 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | United States | ||
+ | | 153 | ||
+ | | 50 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | colspan="3"| | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! South America | ||
+ | ! 2 | ||
+ | ! 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! | ||
+ | ! 0.35% | ||
+ | ! 0.00% | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Argentina | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | colspan="3"| | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! Anonymous | ||
+ | ! 1 | ||
+ | ! 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | 0.18% | ||
+ | | 0.00% | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Overall Total | ||
+ | | 569 | ||
+ | | 120 | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Distribution for Short Papers == | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {| class="wikitable" border="1" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! | ||
+ | ! # submitted | ||
+ | ! # accepted | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! Asia & Pacific | ||
+ | ! 183 | ||
+ | ! 48 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! colspan="3"| 15 countries, 183/356= 51.40% of submissions, 48/93=51.61% of accepted papers | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Australia | ||
+ | | 6 | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | China | ||
+ | | 51 | ||
+ | | 9 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Hong Kong S.A.R. | ||
+ | | 12 | ||
+ | | 4 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | India | ||
+ | | 16 | ||
+ | | 5 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Japan | ||
+ | | 42 | ||
+ | | 11 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Malaysia | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | New Zealand | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Republic of Korea | ||
+ | | 16 | ||
+ | | 8 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Singapore | ||
+ | | 7 | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Taiwan | ||
+ | | 15 | ||
+ | | 3 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Thailand | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Vietnam | ||
+ | | 4 | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Iran | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Israel | ||
+ | | 3 | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Turkey | ||
+ | | 4 | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | colspan="3"| | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! Europe | ||
+ | ! 85 | ||
+ | ! 21 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! colspan="3" | 14 countries, 85/356=23.88% of submissions, 21/93=22.58% of accepted papers | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Belgium | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Czech Republic | ||
+ | | 4 | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Denmark | ||
+ | | 4 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | France | ||
+ | | 8 | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Germany | ||
+ | | 21 | ||
+ | | 7 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Isle of Man | ||
+ | | 4 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Italy | ||
+ | | 8 | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Netherlands | ||
+ | | 3 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Poland | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Portugal | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Spain | ||
+ | | 14 | ||
+ | | 3 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Sweden | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Switzerland | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | United Kingdom | ||
+ | | 12 | ||
+ | | 5 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | colspan="3"| | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! North America | ||
+ | ! 88 | ||
+ | ! 24 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! colspan="3" | 3 countries, 88/356=24.72% of submissions, 24/93=25.81% of accepted papers | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Canada | ||
+ | | 5 | ||
+ | | 2 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Cuba | ||
+ | | 1 | ||
+ | | 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | United States | ||
+ | | 82 | ||
+ | | 22 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | colspan="3"| | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Overall Total | ||
+ | | 356 | ||
+ | | 93 | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | The best (student) papers will be announced at the end of | ||
+ | the conference. This will allow time for the decision | ||
+ | process, which involves soliciting suggestions from the area | ||
+ | chairs, and forming a committee to read and judge the camera ready | ||
+ | papers. <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Jian Su, Jan Wiebe ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Program Committee Chairs July 6, 2009 |
Latest revision as of 23:32, 8 July 2009
This year, we received a record number of 925 valid paper submissions -- a 24% submission increase over ACL-08: HLT -- with 569 full papers and 356 short papers. The significant submission increase shows how vigorous our field is.
20 Area Chairs worked with 489 Program Committee members and 85 additional reviewers to come up with 2,551 reviews, in total, for the final paper selection. 21% of the full paper submissions are accepted; all of these will be presented orally. 26% of the short paper submissions are accepted; some of these will be presented orally and some will be given as poster presentations. While short papers are distinguished from full papers in the proceedings, there is no distinction in the proceedings between short papers presented orally and those presented as poster presentations. Furthermore, the short-paper posters are clustered together by topic and assigned poster numbers, to provide better information access for the audience and easier logistics for the Local Arrangements Committee.
Submissions and acceptances by areas are as following:
Full papers | #sub | #accepted |
---|---|---|
Phonology/morphology, POS tagging and chunking, Word Segmentation | 31 | 8 (26%) |
Syntax and Parsing | 49 | 14(29%) |
Semantics | 67 | 14(21%) |
Discourse, Dialogue and Pragmatics | 43 | 9 (21%) |
Summarization and Generation | 44 | 8 (18%) |
Statistical and Machine Learning Methods | 40 | 6 (15%) |
Machine Translation | 82 | 23(28%) |
Information Retrieval | 28 | 4 (14%) |
Information Extraction | 49 | 10(20%) |
Sentiment Analysis, Opinion Mining and Text Classification | 45 | 7 (16%) |
Spoken Language Processing | 19 | 6 (32%) |
Question Answering | 25 | 3 (12%) |
Text Mining and NLP Applications | 21 | 4 (19%) |
Language Resource | 26 | 4 (15%) |
Total | 569 | 120(21%) |
Short papers | #sub | #accepted |
---|---|---|
Phonology/morphology, POS tagging and chunking, Word Segmentation | 16 | 4 (25%) |
Syntax and Parsing | 28 | 8 (29%) |
Semantics | 33 | 9 (27%) |
Discourse, Dialogue and Pragmatics | 21 | 7 (33%) |
Summarization and Generation | 24 | 8 (33%) |
Statistical and Machine Learning Methods | 21 | 7 (33%) |
Machine Translation | 57 | 13(23%) |
Information Retrieval | 26 | 4 (15%) |
Information Extraction | 26 | 5 (19%) |
Sentiment Analysis, Opinion Mining and Text Classification | 44 | 13(30%) |
Spoken Language Processing | 16 | 5 (31%) |
Question Answering | 25 | 3 (25%) |
Text Mining and NLP Applications | 16 | 3 (19%) |
Language Resource | 16 | 4 (25%) |
Total | 356 | 93(26%) |
The geographical distribution of the first authors of all
submissions is shown below. We received submissions from 41
countries: about 51% from 20 countries in Asia
Pacific, 27% from Canada, Cuba and the United States, 22% from 15
countries in Europe, less than 1% from Argentina and one anonymous submission.
Distribution for Full Papers
# submission | # accepted | |
---|---|---|
Asia & Pacific | 288 | 46 |
19 Countries, 288/569= 50.62% of submissions, 46/120 = 38.33% of accepted papers | ||
Australia | 12 | 2 |
China | 98 | 15 |
Hong Kong S.A.R. | 11 | 3 |
India | 20 | 1 |
Indonesia | 2 | 0 |
Iran | 4 | 0 |
Israel | 16 | 3 |
Japan | 73 | 12 |
Malaysia | 1 | 0 |
Oman | 1 | 0 |
Pakistan | 1 | 0 |
Philippines | 2 | 0 |
Republic of Korea | 15 | 2 |
Singapore | 15 | 7 |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 0 |
Taiwan | 12 | 1 |
Thailand | 1 | 0 |
Turkey | 1 | 0 |
Vietnam | 2 | 0 |
Europe | 115 | 18 |
16 countries, 115/569 = 20.21% of submissions, 18/120 = 15.00% of accepted
papers | ||
Belgium | 3 | 0 |
Czech Republic | 4 | 0 |
Denmark | 4 | 1 |
Finland | 1 | 0 |
France | 12 | 1 |
Germany | 24 | 6 |
Isle of Man | 3 | 0 |
Italy | 10 | 1 |
Netherlands | 2 | 1 |
Portugal | 1 | 0 |
Romania | 2 | 0 |
Russian Federation | 2 | 0 |
Spain | 12 | 2 |
Sweden | 8 | 1 |
Switzerland | 3 | 1 |
United Kindom | 24 | 4 |
North America | 163 | 56 |
2 countries, 163/569=28.65% of submissions, 56/120=46.67% of accepted papers | ||
Canada | 10 | 6 |
United States | 153 | 50 |
South America | 2 | 0 |
0.35% | 0.00% | |
Argentina | 2 | 0 |
Anonymous | 1 | 0 |
0.18% | 0.00% | |
Overall Total | 569 | 120 |
Distribution for Short Papers
# submitted | # accepted | |
---|---|---|
Asia & Pacific | 183 | 48 |
15 countries, 183/356= 51.40% of submissions, 48/93=51.61% of accepted papers | ||
Australia | 6 | 2 |
China | 51 | 9 |
Hong Kong S.A.R. | 12 | 4 |
India | 16 | 5 |
Japan | 42 | 11 |
Malaysia | 2 | 0 |
New Zealand | 1 | 0 |
Republic of Korea | 16 | 8 |
Singapore | 7 | 2 |
Taiwan | 15 | 3 |
Thailand | 2 | 0 |
Vietnam | 4 | 1 |
Iran | 2 | 0 |
Israel | 3 | 1 |
Turkey | 4 | 2 |
Europe | 85 | 21 |
14 countries, 85/356=23.88% of submissions, 21/93=22.58% of accepted papers | ||
Belgium | 1 | 1 |
Czech Republic | 4 | 2 |
Denmark | 4 | 0 |
France | 8 | 1 |
Germany | 21 | 7 |
Isle of Man | 4 | 0 |
Italy | 8 | 1 |
Netherlands | 3 | 0 |
Poland | 1 | 0 |
Portugal | 1 | 1 |
Spain | 14 | 3 |
Sweden | 2 | 0 |
Switzerland | 2 | 0 |
United Kingdom | 12 | 5 |
North America | 88 | 24 |
3 countries, 88/356=24.72% of submissions, 24/93=25.81% of accepted papers | ||
Canada | 5 | 2 |
Cuba | 1 | 0 |
United States | 82 | 22 |
Overall Total | 356 | 93 |
The best (student) papers will be announced at the end of
the conference. This will allow time for the decision
process, which involves soliciting suggestions from the area
chairs, and forming a committee to read and judge the camera ready
papers.
Jian Su, Jan Wiebe ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Program Committee Chairs July 6, 2009