Difference between revisions of "Exec To Do List"
DragoRadev (talk | contribs) |
DragoRadev (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
# A resolution was approved to allocate $10K for student travel per conference. The budget template to be modified accordingly. | # A resolution was approved to allocate $10K for student travel per conference. The budget template to be modified accordingly. | ||
# A resolution was passed to thank Min Yen Kan for his work on the ACL Anthology. Thank Min. | # A resolution was passed to thank Min Yen Kan for his work on the ACL Anthology. Thank Min. | ||
+ | # Steven is liaising with Softconf about the integration of the ACLPUB software into START, to streamline the publication process. | ||
+ | # General conference todo items: | ||
+ | - continuity of the conference logo design (on everything) | ||
+ | - post signage that anticipates questions | ||
+ | - monitor for announcements and daily schedules | ||
+ | - make the source for the conference handbook publicly available | ||
+ | - print the conference handbook only after all session and room information is available | ||
+ | - Jan suggested that a central repository for handbook information should be made available to avoid duplication | ||
+ | - Everyone should be careful when dealing with sensitive data. | ||
+ | - It was suggested that the conference reviewing software should be linked directly with the Anthology. | ||
+ | - It was also suggested to use the conference reviewing software to assign presentation slots at the conference. | ||
+ | - Make all latex style files available. | ||
+ | - Don’t start at 8:30 AM | ||
+ | - Try and come up with better attendance estimates | ||
+ | - There should be a backup plan for submission sites. | ||
+ | - Standardize the workshops’s schedules. | ||
+ | - Hold a survey to determine the optimal duration of EMNLP (e.g., 2 or 3 days). | ||
+ | - There should be a workshop coordinator for each conference, not just for the entire year. | ||
+ | - the percentages of accepted papers and posters should be given collectively (in concert with the understanding that posters are more than just second-tier papers). |
Revision as of 11:27, 19 November 2009
- Change guidelines to say that the newest member will join the cc for the next conference (e.g., person after Hwee Tou, that is Lori Levin should be on 2011cc) (DRAGO?)
- Decide whether to encourage bids from organizations not affiliated with universities (cf Puerto Rico's recent bid, EMNLP in Hawaii)
- For local bids - check if VAT has to be paid, don't confuse ACL office staff with local staff, don't hire a huge local staff, justify any rebudgetings, go to the treasurer if going over budget)
- Keep w/s attendance figures on wiki
- line up all conference chairs by end of previous summer
- ?? authorize the sponsorship cmte to design a procedure to hire sponsorship chairs who would get commissions
- follow up on last two years' membership proposals - possible get more proposals
- request less detail of preliminary site bids
- Kam Fai: discuss conference liability
- Graeme: auditing ACL
- Ido: involve dancing
- Ask authors to update their reference lists at the time of publication.
- very few submissions in IR/speech
- determine cost for "facebook" application (Robert)
- Drago: consider its relationship with AAN: http://belobog.si.umich.edu/clair/anthology/index.cgi
- post papers online as soon as they are ready (and not on the first day of the conference) (CONF CHAIR)
- Check insurance of European accounts (Graeme, with Mike Rosner)
- explore idea of streaming video of conference talks integrated with Portal (Robert, Steven)
- Drago send update on results of last round of ACL member initiatives so we can decide whether to do it again at ACL-2009 [Drago]
- authentication issue re publisher discount page to resolve [Drago, Bonnie, Priscilla, ...]
- revise the estimated ratio between full and discounted tickets for the banquet based on data from recent conferences [Priscilla]
- send info about ACL bid process to EACL and NAACL in case they want to revise their processes [Ido]
- write up concerns about divergence between ACL and NAACL approach to posters [Drago]
- issue of replacement of elected officers who step down to be resolved offline [Ido]
- Action: issue of declaring single nominee elected; procedures could go into SIG constitution template -- resolve offline [Ido]
- Finalize the discussion about the algorithm for the 3-pack sponsorship
- A resolution was approved to allocate $10K for student travel per conference. The budget template to be modified accordingly.
- A resolution was passed to thank Min Yen Kan for his work on the ACL Anthology. Thank Min.
- Steven is liaising with Softconf about the integration of the ACLPUB software into START, to streamline the publication process.
- General conference todo items:
- continuity of the conference logo design (on everything) - post signage that anticipates questions - monitor for announcements and daily schedules - make the source for the conference handbook publicly available - print the conference handbook only after all session and room information is available - Jan suggested that a central repository for handbook information should be made available to avoid duplication - Everyone should be careful when dealing with sensitive data. - It was suggested that the conference reviewing software should be linked directly with the Anthology. - It was also suggested to use the conference reviewing software to assign presentation slots at the conference. - Make all latex style files available. - Don’t start at 8:30 AM - Try and come up with better attendance estimates - There should be a backup plan for submission sites. - Standardize the workshops’s schedules. - Hold a survey to determine the optimal duration of EMNLP (e.g., 2 or 3 days). - There should be a workshop coordinator for each conference, not just for the entire year. - the percentages of accepted papers and posters should be given collectively (in concert with the understanding that posters are more than just second-tier papers).