Difference between revisions of "2024Q3 Reports: TACL Journal Editor"
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
presenting the number of published pages per year. | presenting the number of published pages per year. | ||
| − | [[File: Number of Pages per Volume]] | + | [[File: Number of Pages per Volume.png|800px]] |
| + | 4. InMarch2023wepresentedanewdesk-rejectionpolicy,accordingtowhich | ||
| + | action editors are actively encouraged to screen papers for desk rejection based on their content. According to this policy, if both the handling AE and EiC agree that the paper does not meet the TACL standards, they jointly phrase a rejection message which is then sent to the authors from the TACL formal office account. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The following graph presents the desk rejections statistics since this policy has been presented. As can be seen the rate of content-based desk-rejections is typically 10-30%. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File: submission and desk rejects.png|800px]] | ||
[[File: TACL 2024 Q3 Report.pdf]] | [[File: TACL 2024 Q3 Report.pdf]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:27, 6 August 2024
1. We are pleased to announce the completion of our recruitment process for a new editorial assistant. We would like to welcome Yesari Tolga Eden to our team. Tolga will be joining our founding editorial assistant, Cindy Robinson. We are confident that Tolga will play a vital role in helping us manage our ever-growing number of submissions.
2. Review policy change, in order to smooth the resubmission process (as of May
2024):
- Reviewers should now distinguish between mandatory and
non-mandatory comments.
- Action editors should augment a (C) (revise and resubmit) decision with a
final list of mandatory comments and if authors succeed in addressing these comments the paper is accepted.
3. TACL is growing fast:
The publication volume is constantly growing, as can be seen in the following graph, presenting the number of published pages per year.
4. InMarch2023wepresentedanewdesk-rejectionpolicy,accordingtowhich action editors are actively encouraged to screen papers for desk rejection based on their content. According to this policy, if both the handling AE and EiC agree that the paper does not meet the TACL standards, they jointly phrase a rejection message which is then sent to the authors from the TACL formal office account.
The following graph presents the desk rejections statistics since this policy has been presented. As can be seen the rate of content-based desk-rejections is typically 10-30%.
