2018Q3 Reports: Program Chairs
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Program Committee
Organising Committee
General Chair
- Claire Cardie, Cornell University
Program Chairs
- Iryna Gurevych, TU Darmstadt
- Yusuke Miyao, National Institute of Informatics
Workshop Chairs
- Brendan O’Connor, University of Massachusetts Amherst
- Eva Maria Vecchi, University of Cambridge
Tutorial Chairs
- Yoav Artzi, Cornell University
- Jacob Eisenstein, Georgia Institute of Technology
Demo Chairs
- Fei Liu, University of Central Florida
- Thamar Solorio, University of Houston
Publications Chairs
- Shay Cohen, University of Edinburgh
- Kevin Gimpel, Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago
- Wei Lu, Singapore University of Technology and Design (Advisory)
Exhibits Coordinator
- Karin Verspoor, University of Melbourne
Conference Handbook Chairs
- Jey Han Lau, IBM Research
- Trevor Cohn, University of Melbourne
Publicity Chair
- Sarvnaz Karimi, CSIRO
Local Sponsorship Chair
- Cecile Paris, CSIRO
Local Chairs
- Tim Baldwin, University of Melbourne
- Karin Verspoor, University of Melbourne
- Trevor Cohn, University of Melbourne
Student Research Workshop Organisers
- Vered Shwartz, Bar-Ilan University
- Jeniya Tabassum, Ohio State University
- Rob Voigt, Stanford University
Faculty Advisors to the Student Research Workshop
- Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Ohio State
- Wanxiang Che, Harbin Institute of Technology
- Malvina Nissim, University of Groningen
Webmaster
- Andrew MacKinlay(acl2018web@gmail.com), Culture Amp / University of Melbourne
Area chairs
- Dialogue and Interactive Systems:
- Asli Celikyilmaz Senior Chair
- Verena Rieser
- Milica Gasic
- Jason Williams
- Discourse and Pragmatics:
- Manfred Stede
- Ani Nenkova Senior Chair
- Document Analysis:
- Hang Li Senior Chair
- Yiqun Liu
- Eugene Agichtein
- Generation:
- Ioannis Konstas
- Claire Gardent Senior Chair
- Information Extraction and Text Mining:
- Feiyu Xu
- Kevin Cohen
- Zhiyuan Liu
- Ralph Grishman Senior Chair
- Yi Yang
- Nazli Goharian
- Linguistic Theories, Cognitive Modeling and Psycholinguistics:
- Shuly Wintner Senior Chair
- Tim O'Donnell Senior Chair
- Machine Learning:
- Andre Martins
- Ariadna Quattoni
- Jun Suzuki Senior Chair
- Machine Translation:
- Yang Liu
- Matt Post Senior Chair
- Lucia Specia
- Dekai Wu
- Multidisciplinary (also for AC COI):
- Yoav Goldberg Senior Chair
- Anders S?gaard Senior Chair
- Mirella Lapata Senior Chair
- Multilinguality:
- Bernardo Magnini Senior Chair
- Tristan Miller
- Phonology, Morphology and Word Segmentation:
- Graham Neubig
- Hai Zhao Senior Chair
- Question Answering:
- Lluís Màrquez Senior Chair
- Teruko Mitamura
- Zornitsa Kozareva
- Richard Socher
- Resources and Evaluation:
- Gerard de Melo
- Sara Tonelli
- Karën Fort Senior Chair
- Sentence-level Semantics:
- Luke Zettlemoyer Senior Chair
- Ellie Pavlick
- Jacob Uszkoreit
- Sentiment Analysis and Argument Mining:
- Smaranda Muresan
- Benno Stein
- Yulan He Senior Chair
- Social Media:
- David Jurgens
- Jing Jiang Senior Chair
- Summarization:
- Kathleen McKeown Senior Chair
- Xiaodan Zhu
- Tagging, Chunking, Syntax and Parsing:
- Liang Huang Senior Chair
- Weiwei Sun
- Željko Agić
- Yue Zhang
- Textual Inference and Other Areas of Semantics:
- Michael Roth Senior Chair
- Fabio Massimo Zanzotto Senior Chair
- Vision, Robotics, Multimodal, Grounding and Speech:
- Yoav Artzi Senior Chair
- Shinji Watanabe
- Timothy Hospedales
- Word-level Semantics:
- Ekaterina Shutova
- Roberto Navigli Senior Chair
Main Innovations
PC co-chairs mainly focused on solving the problems of review quality and reviewer workload, because they are becoming a serious issue due to a rapidly increasing number of submissions while a limited number of experienced reviewers is available.
- New structured review form (in cooperation with NAACL 2018) to address key contributions of the reviewed papers, strong arguments in favor or against, and other aspects (see also below under “Review Process”). Sample review form was made available to the community in advance: https://acl2018.org/2018/02/20/sample-review-form/
- Overall rating scale changed from 1-5 to 1-6, where 6 stands for “award-level” paper (see details below under “Review Process”).
- The role of PC chair assistants filled by several senior postdocs to manage the PC communication in a timely manner, draft documents and help the PC co-chairs during most intensive work phases.
- Each area has a Senior Area Chair responsible for decision making in the area, including assigning papers to other Area Chairs, determining final recommendations, as well as writing meta-reviews, if necessary.
- Each Area Chair is assigned around 30 papers as a meta-reviewer. They are responsible for their pool in various steps of reviewing, e.g. checking desk-reject cases, chasing late reviewers, improving review comments, leading discussions, etc. This made the responsibility of area chairs clear and the overall review process went smoothly.
- The “Multidisciplinary” area from previous years was renamed to “Multidisciplinary / also for AC COI” to make sure Area Chairs’ papers will be reviewed in this area in order to prevent any conflict of interest
- Weak PC COI (e.g., groups associated with the PC through graduate schools or project partners) were handled by the other PC. Program chairs’ research groups were not allowed to submit papers to ACL in order to prevent any COI.
- A bottom-up community-based approach for soliciting area chairs, reviewers, and invited speakers (https://acl2018.org/2017/09/06/call-for-nominations/)
- Toronto Paper Matching System (TPMS) has been used since ACL 2017, while this year we used TPMS also for assigning papers to area chairs (as a meta-reviewer) and have encouraged the community to create their TPMS profiles.
- Automatic checking of the paper format has been implemented in START. Authors were notified when a potential format violation was found during the submission process. This significantly reduced the number of desk rejects due to incidental format violations.